Only the failure of parents should resort to corporal punishment. “Most importantly, parents, school boards, teachers and students should make efforts to create an environment that does not allow corporal punishment in athletic training,” he added. “There is even a suspicion that there is a tendency to praise coaches who use violence in training as `engaged.`” If only research could support your opinion. This is not the case. In terms of context, why should people beat a child if they don`t believe that the violent punishment produced a good person? Unless they have their own emotional problems – which is very likely in at least a percentage of those who do. To end child mortality, measures such as the prohibition of corporal punishment must be accompanied by efforts to increase the number and skills of child protection officials. I guess Swat is not really a punishment because it shouldn`t be that difficult. The problem with “studies” is that they don`t take into account all the data. The above “study” was conducted with the opinions of nearly 800 people on corporal punishment. Someone suggested citing studies on the effects of corporal punishment.
It would be the number of children and how they respond to corporal punishment. The 2019 supplementary resolution further required the government to raise public awareness of the harmful effects of corporal punishment and provide parents with information and support on alternative methods of discipline. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Social Affairs has since issued a notice to prefectures and cities urging them to disseminate the guidelines to parents, institutions and the general public, and is planning an awareness-raising campaign. These measures are to be welcomed, as it is crucial that governments take steps to properly implement a post-promulgation ban. The government should continue to disseminate information about the ban and increase its support for parenting education programmes and large-scale awareness campaigns. Despite the shock of the teacher`s behavior in the media, among politicians and parents, it apparently did not end a practice that has long been banned in Japanese schools. The corporal punishment in Osaka`s suicide case took place during an after-school exercise at a sports club. The imposition of corporal punishment during these extracurricular activities was more widely accepted than punishment during school hours, especially if the club has a record of wins. (Richard Parker (pseudonym), Right or Wrong, Corporal Punishment Can Produce Winners, JAPAN TIMES (March 12, 2013).) The circular specifically mentions club extracurricular activities for the first time and confirms that corporal punishment is not permitted during these activities. (The circular, § 5.) What was said before and during the administration of the punishment? It is unlikely to be the same. Was the child punished fairly – did the punishment correspond to the crime? Was the sentence imposed because the parent in question was throwing a tantrum, or was it reasonably assessed and administered? Has the child had an opportunity to express his or her point of view? Were these children all the same age? Was any of the children interviewed sick, tired and reacting to something? If the child was hit, how forcefully was the blow executed? Has the blood flowed? Was there a bruise afterwards? Was the child also mocked in front of friends? Brother? Other children in the class? Were the parents drunk? On drugs? Was the child taking drugs? Did the people who responded to the survey tell the truth? Yes, the magic word is “behavior.” It is very true that you can change your behavior through punishment and even more effectively through violent punishment.
In addition to not tolerating corporal punishment, behaviorists are also not very interested in the inner workings of children. Obviously, some Japanese do not even understand the most basic and important definitions of corporal punishment. Then they will say that beating people is not a criminal attack. “Violence is often used in leadership at all levels of education – from elementary schools to universities,” the document says. “Coaches should be given strict instructions not to use violence against students. It is now illegal for such things to happen. A teacher who physically punishes a student can certainly be suspended, fired, and charged if the child`s parents wish. Anyone who uses corporal punishment against a child should live in the trees again, as they have not evolved beyond a chimpanzee. Come on, bass, be specific. They went from corporal punishment only as a last resort, when all else failed, to beating tiny babies whenever a parent deemed it appropriate.
What behavior can you imagine that a six-month-old baby is so inappropriate that the parents` only option is to hit? What replaced it was either the total absence of action (without consequences, I can do what I want!), or psychological punishment. that lasts a lifetime and leads children to become wasted adults. Every school day, an average of 68 students are beaten, beaten, kicked or physically punished by their teachers, despite the fact that corporal punishment is prohibited by law. A new report from the Ministry of Education confirmed that 6,721 teachers had used corporal punishment.